– Discuss and evaluate Plantinga’s argument that Evolutionary Naturalism is self-defeating.
**** ONLY USE THE SOURCES PROVIDED, NO OUTSIDE SOURCES!!! *****
Here’s a suggested roadmap for a paper: To evaluate any argument is to explain whether it is both valid and sound — be sure to do this (NO FLOWERY LANGUAGE)
Introduction: Just one paragraph, two at the most. Briefly describe your topic, clearly state your central thesis, and say what each section of the paper will do.
Section 1: Explaining what happens in the texts you’re evaluating.
Section 2: Make a strong argument of your own in support of your thesis. (E.g. “The best way for Locke to address the rarity of explicit consent is…”)
Section 3: Objections! Explain at least one way that a reasonable person might think that your argument in support of your thesis (from section 2) doesn’t work. Then explain why the worry you’ve named is not a good one. (Feel free to do this step multiple times—bring up more than one objection, and then show why each one doesn’t succeed.)
PLEASE ONLY USE DOCUMENTS PROVIDED, NO OUTSIDE SOURCES.4 attachmentsSlide 1 of 4